葡萄生产中应用植物生长调节剂的必要性、合法性与安全性

    Necessity, legality and safety of the plant growth regulators applied in viticulture

    • 摘要: 植物生长调节剂在我国葡萄生产中应用广泛,登记产品众多,但其使用的必要性和安全性素来饱受争议。本文先从葡萄生产调控需求与登记产品匹配性入手,论证植物生长调节剂在葡萄生长调控中应用的必要性与使用的合法性;再从残留限量标准规定、残留水平及膳食风险角度,解析施药后葡萄的安全性,并比较了国内外葡萄上常用植物生长调节剂的登记应用和限量标准情况。结果发现:1)植物生长调节剂在现代葡萄规模化生产中不可或缺,当前中国葡萄上登记的植物生长调节剂产品在有效成分和关键调控节点上基本覆盖产业需求,合规使用合法,但相较日本、美国等国,欠缺对品种和生产模式等的关注。2)现有植物生长调节剂的残留限量标准覆盖了葡萄生产常用的单氰胺、氯吡脲、噻苯隆和S-诱抗素,但相对现有登记品种覆盖度仍明显不足。此外,国内外对葡萄上氯吡脲和噻苯隆的残留限量规定有较大差异。3)葡萄中植物生长调节剂残留的膳食摄入风险低,食用安全有保证。据此,笔者提出了完善葡萄植物生长调节剂应用与监管的相关建议,如建立差异化农药登记机制,推进标准与登记联动的标准制定体系,发展标准化生产和常态化科普等,以期为植物生长调节剂在葡萄上的科学使用及其登记和限量标准制修订提供依据。

       

      Abstract: The plant growth regulators (PGRs) are widely used in Chinese viticulture, with a substantial number of registered products; however, the applied necessity and safety remain subject of ongoing debate. This study first examines the alignment between the regulation needs in grape production and currently registered products to demonstrate the necessity and legal basis for using PGRs in viticulture. It then evaluates the safety of PGR-treated grapes from the perspectives of maximum residue limit (MRL) regulations, actual residue levels, and dietary risk, and further compares the registration status and MRL standards for commonly used PGRs on grapes between China and other countries. The main findings are as follows: Firstly, PGRs are indispensable in modern viticulture. The usage of registered products is legal, which basically matches the Chinese viticulture needs in terms of active ingredients and key regulatory points. However, the registration information lacks the specificity of cultivars and cultivation modes compared to frameworks in Japan and the USA. Secondly, the domestic MRLs have already covered the commonly used active ingredients used in viticulture, such as cyanamide, forchlorfenuron, thidiazuron, and S-abscisic acid, but the overall coverage remains notably inadequate relative to the range of currently registered PGRs. In addition, the domestic and international MRLs for forchlorfenuron and thidiazuron on grapes exhibited significant discrepancies. Thirdly, the residues and dietary exposure risks of PGRs from grapes were all at relatively low levels, indicating that grape consumption is safe from a food safety standpoint. Based on these findings, the authors propose several recommendations to improve the application and regulatory system of PGRs used in viticulture, including establishing a differentiated pesticide registration mechanism targeting specific cultivars and cultivation models, synchronising the residue standard with the pesticide registration, promoting standardized cultivation practices, and enhancing routine science communication and public outreach. These measures aim to provide a scientific foundation for the rational use of PGRs on grapes and inform future revisions of registration policies and MRL standards.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回