张敏, 赵炽娜, 韩飞, 李旭军, 李俊凯, 徐志红. 5种甾醇生物合成抑制剂类 (SBIs) 抗真菌药物对9种植物病原真菌的活性筛选[J]. 农药学学报, 2020, 22(1): 182-187. DOI: 10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2020.0018
    引用本文: 张敏, 赵炽娜, 韩飞, 李旭军, 李俊凯, 徐志红. 5种甾醇生物合成抑制剂类 (SBIs) 抗真菌药物对9种植物病原真菌的活性筛选[J]. 农药学学报, 2020, 22(1): 182-187. DOI: 10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2020.0018
    ZHANG Min, ZHAO China, HAN Fei, LI Xujun, LI Junkai, XU Zhihong. Screening of antifungal activity on nine phytopathogenic fungi of five sterol biosynthesis inhibitors (SBIs) antifungal agents[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2020, 22(1): 182-187. DOI: 10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2020.0018
    Citation: ZHANG Min, ZHAO China, HAN Fei, LI Xujun, LI Junkai, XU Zhihong. Screening of antifungal activity on nine phytopathogenic fungi of five sterol biosynthesis inhibitors (SBIs) antifungal agents[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2020, 22(1): 182-187. DOI: 10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2020.0018

    5种甾醇生物合成抑制剂类 (SBIs) 抗真菌药物对9种植物病原真菌的活性筛选

    Screening of antifungal activity on nine phytopathogenic fungi of five sterol biosynthesis inhibitors (SBIs) antifungal agents

    • 摘要: 为了寻找高效、低毒以及环境友好型的农药先导化合物,通过菌丝生长速率法测定了5种甾醇生物合成抑制剂类 (SBIs) 抗真菌药物 (益康唑、氟康唑、伏立康唑、酮康唑和咪康唑) 对7种植物病原菌的抑制效果,选择其中活性较高的药物进行了防治小麦白粉病和水稻纹枯病的盆栽试验及防治小麦条锈病和水稻纹枯病的田间药效试验。室内毒力测定结果表明:伏立康唑对供试的7种植物病原真菌的杀菌活性最高,其EC50值均低于0.349 mg/L,咪康唑对小麦赤霉病菌、梨黑斑病菌、西瓜枯萎病菌和香樟炭疽病菌,益康唑对梨黑斑病菌和西瓜枯萎病菌,以及酮康唑对水稻稻瘟病菌均表现出较强的杀菌活性,且均高于对照药剂苯醚甲环唑。盆栽试验结果显示:在药剂质量浓度为37.5 mg/L时,伏立康唑和氟康唑对小麦白粉病的防治效果分别为98.26%和89.11%,明显高于商品化杀菌剂三唑醇;在质量浓度为150 mg/L 时,益康唑对水稻纹枯病的防治效果最好,为86.14%。田间试验结果表明:在有效剂量为240 g/hm2时,氟康唑对小麦条锈病的防效为98.42%,益康唑对水稻纹枯病的防效为75.21%。研究结果表明,临床上的抗真菌药物氟康唑、伏立康唑和益康唑对植物病原真菌也具有很高的活性,可望作为农用杀菌剂的先导化合物进一步研究。

       

      Abstract: In order to discover efficient, low toxicity and environmentally friendly pesticide lead compounds, the inhibitory effects of five sterol biosynthesis inhibitors (SBIs) antifungal drugs (econazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, ketoconazole and miconazole) against seven plant pathogens were determined by mycelial growth rate method. After the preliminarily screening, effective fungicides were further tested in greenhouse and in field. The results showed that voriconazole had the highest fungicidal activities against the seven plant pathogens, and its EC50 values were lower than 0.349 mg/L. Miconazole exhibited potent fungicidal activities against Fusahum graminearum, Alternaria kikuchiana, Fusarium oxysporum and Glomerella cingulata. Econazole showed strong fungicidal activities against A. kikuchiana and F. oxysporum, ketoconazole displayed excellent fungicidal activities against Magnaporthe oryzae. Both their EC50 value were higher than that of difenoconazole against the corresponding plant pathogens. In greenhouse, voriconazole and fluconazole showed excellent inhibitory effects against wheat powdery mildew with the control efficiencies of 98.26% and 89.11%, respectively, at the dosage of 37.5 mg/L, which were higher than that of the commercial fungicide triadimenol. At the dosage of 150 mg/L, econazole showed strong inhibitory effect against rice sheath blight with the control efficiency of 86.14%. In the field trial, the control efficiency of fluconazole against wheat stripe rust was 98.42%, and the control efficacy of econazole against rice sheath blight was 75.21% at the dose of 240 g a.i./hm2. Fluconazole, voriconazole and econazole exhibited potent fungicidal activities against the tested plant pathogens, which can be used as lead compounds for agricultural fungicides.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回