李雄, 张楠, 李贤宾, 苍涛, 杨峻, 黄中乔, 苗建强, 刘西莉. 杀菌剂田间试验防病效果的4种常用计算公式比较分析[J]. 农药学学报, 2021, 23(3): 492-498. DOI: 10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2021.0077
    引用本文: 李雄, 张楠, 李贤宾, 苍涛, 杨峻, 黄中乔, 苗建强, 刘西莉. 杀菌剂田间试验防病效果的4种常用计算公式比较分析[J]. 农药学学报, 2021, 23(3): 492-498. DOI: 10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2021.0077
    LI Xiong, ZHANG Nan, LI Xianbin, CANG Tao, YANG Jun, HUANG Zhongqiao, MIAO Jianqiang, LIU Xili. Comparative analysis of the four formulas commonly used for calculating the control efficacy of fungicides on disease in field trials[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2021, 23(3): 492-498. DOI: 10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2021.0077
    Citation: LI Xiong, ZHANG Nan, LI Xianbin, CANG Tao, YANG Jun, HUANG Zhongqiao, MIAO Jianqiang, LIU Xili. Comparative analysis of the four formulas commonly used for calculating the control efficacy of fungicides on disease in field trials[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2021, 23(3): 492-498. DOI: 10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2021.0077

    杀菌剂田间试验防病效果的4种常用计算公式比较分析

    Comparative analysis of the four formulas commonly used for calculating the control efficacy of fungicides on disease in field trials

    • 摘要: 田间药效试验是农药登记试验管理中重要的组成部分,其中病害防治效果计算公式的适用性、有效性和精确性,对科学合理评价杀菌剂对病害的田间防治效果至关重要。目前常用的几种计算公式在适用性和计算误差上存在差异,而对于常用公式之间的比较至今尚未见系统的研究报道。本研究通过理论推导、数值模拟等方式比较验证了多个变量不同组合条件下4种常用计算公式的防治效果变化趋势,准确评价了常用计算公式的应用范围和计算结果的稳定性,并对处理区药后观测的病情指数进行了修正。结果表明:在固定处理区和对照区药后病情指数条件下,4种常用公式计算结果对处理区、对照区初始病情指数差异的敏感程度表现不同;当处理区施药前后病情指数变化极小时,采用公式(1)、(3)和杨信东公式(4)计算防治效果会出现计算结果不依赖对照区病情指数的情况,且当处理区药后病情指数低于药前病情指数时,计算结果会大于100%,出现防效值溢出现象,而Henderson-Tilton公式公式(2)是以施药前后病情指数变化率来计算防治效果,可以有效规避结果偏差或防效值溢出;而当对照区初始病情指数较大,且病情发生速率快时,建议采用杨信东公式(4)计算防治效果,可以减少处理区和对照区因药后病情指数差异而带来的误差。综合考虑田间施药前后的各种影响因素,在确保病害发生初期施药条件下公式(2)更具适用性和准确性。

       

      Abstract: Field efficacy trials are an indispensable part of pesticide registration management. The applicability, accuracy and effectiveness of the formulas for calculating the control effect of fungicide on plant disease are crucial for the scientific and reasonable evaluation of the field control efficacy of fungicides on plant diseases. At present, the commonly used calculation formulas are different in applicability and calculation errors, but there was no systematic study on the comparison between the commonly used formulas. In this work, four formulas commonly used in field efficacy trials were selected for comparative research. The range of application of the commonly used formulas and the stability of the calculation results were accurately evaluated, and the condition indices observed in the disease index after the treatment were corrected. These results showed that for given disease indexes of the treated groups and the control groups, the four formulas had different sensitivity to the initial difference of disease index between the treated groups and the control groups. When the change of the disease index was extremely small, the results calculated by formula (1), (3) and Yang Xindong's formula (4) were not dependence the disease index of the control groups. When the disease index in the treated groups was reduced after treatment, the results from calculated by formula (1) and (3) were out of the range of corrected efficacy. While Henderson-Tilton formula, namely formula (2) in the paper, was used to calculate the control effect based on the rate of change of the disease index before and after treatment, which could effectively avoid the result deviation or the overflow of the range of corrected efficacy. When the initial disease index was higher in the control groups and disease epidemic occurs rapidly, Yang Xindong's formula was recommended for calculating the control effect, which could reduce errors caused by the difference in disease index after treatment between the treated groups and the control groups. A comprehensive consideration of various influencing factors before and after treatment in field trials indicated that formula (2) was more applicable under the application of fungicides at the early stage of disease development in field.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回