张永强, 王飞钊, 谢锦钿, 张景欣, 林壁润, 杨祁云, 沈会芳, 孙大元, 蒋成爱, 蒲小明. 不同植保器械在水稻不同生育期喷施农药的沉积率及雾滴参数[J]. 农药学学报, 2022, 24(2): 376-384. DOI: 10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2021.0155
    引用本文: 张永强, 王飞钊, 谢锦钿, 张景欣, 林壁润, 杨祁云, 沈会芳, 孙大元, 蒋成爱, 蒲小明. 不同植保器械在水稻不同生育期喷施农药的沉积率及雾滴参数[J]. 农药学学报, 2022, 24(2): 376-384. DOI: 10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2021.0155
    ZHANG Yongqiang, WANG Feizhao, XIE Jintian, ZHANG Jingxin, LIN Birun, YANG Qiyun, SHEN Huifang, SUN Dayuan, JIANG Cheng'ai, PU Xiaoming. Pesticide deposition rates and droplet parameters of different plant protection instruments applied at different growth stages of rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2022, 24(2): 376-384. DOI: 10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2021.0155
    Citation: ZHANG Yongqiang, WANG Feizhao, XIE Jintian, ZHANG Jingxin, LIN Birun, YANG Qiyun, SHEN Huifang, SUN Dayuan, JIANG Cheng'ai, PU Xiaoming. Pesticide deposition rates and droplet parameters of different plant protection instruments applied at different growth stages of rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2022, 24(2): 376-384. DOI: 10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2021.0155

    不同植保器械在水稻不同生育期喷施农药的沉积率及雾滴参数

    Pesticide deposition rates and droplet parameters of different plant protection instruments applied at different growth stages of rice

    • 摘要: 评估不同植保器械的农药喷施效率为水稻上农药减量控害和统防统治工作提供理论技术支撑。本研究参照NY/T 2677—2015《农药沉积率测定方法》,在广东省南雄市全安镇晚造直播水稻田开展农药喷施试验,分析了分别采用手动喷雾器、电动喷雾器和植保无人飞机喷施的农药沉积率及雾滴参数。结果表明:在同一水稻生育期使用不同植保器械喷施的农药沉积率差异显著,表现为植保无人飞机>电动喷雾器>手动喷雾器。在水稻苗期使用手动喷雾器、电动喷雾器和植保无人飞机的平均农药沉积率分别为18.33%、24.58%和35.84%,在水稻封行期的结果分别为24.72%、35.28%和45.15%,在水稻破口期的结果分别为32.39%、40.29%和52.42%。同一植保器械在水稻不同生育期喷施农药的沉积率也存在显著差异,表现为破口期>封行期>苗期。不同冠层的沉积量结果显示:采用植保无人飞机喷施的药液沉积量由上至下递减,采用手动和电动喷雾器喷施的药液主要沉积在水稻植株的上层和中层。植保无人飞机喷施药液的雾滴显著小于手动和电动喷雾器处理,且均匀度更好,同时植保无人飞机喷雾雾滴分散度优于手动和电动喷雾器处理。相对于传统施药器械,使用植保无人飞机喷施显著提高了农药沉积率和药液雾化效果。

       

      Abstract: The evaluation of the pesticide spraying efficiency of different plant protection equipments could provide theoretical and technical support for pesticide reduction and pest control on rice. The method used in this study was referred to an agricultural industry standard the determination method of pesticide deposition rate (NY/T 2677—2015). Experiments were carried out in the late rice field of direct seeding in Quanan town, Nanxiong City, Guangdong Province. The pesticide utilization rates and droplet parameters of manual sprayer, electric sprayer, and plant protection unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) were analyzed. The results were as follows. There were significant differences in pesticide deposition rates of different sprayers at the same rice growth period which showed as UAV>electric sprayer>manual sprayer. The average pesticide deposition rates of manual sprayer, electric sprayer, and UAV were 18.33%, 24.58%, and 35.84% respectively at the seedling stage, 24.72%, 35.28%, and 45.15% respectively at the closure stage, and 32.39%, 40.29%, and 52.42% respectively at the rupturing stage. On the other hand, there were significant differences in pesticide deposition rates of different stages of rice with the same sprayer, which was the rupturing stage>the closure stage>the seedling stage. The results of deposition distributions showed that the deposition values of different rice layers of UAV treatments decreased from top to bottom, and the droplet deposition was mainly concentrated on the upper and middle rice layers by using manual and electric sprayers. In addition, thedroplet size results showed that the size of droplet sprayed by UAV was significantly smaller than that of manual and electric sprayer, and also better with the uniformity. Droplet density results indicated that the dispersion of UAV droplets was better than manual and electric sprayers. Compared with the traditional sprayers, the UAV greatly improved the pesticide deposition rate and the atomization effect of pesticide solution.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回